(GTR)
Hebrews
7
:
11
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
(IS)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Ako je dakle savršenstvo dano po levitskom svećeništvu jer je narod pod njim primio zakon, kakva je još potreba bila, da ustane drugi svećenik po redu Melkizedekovu, a da se ne zove po redu Aronovu?
(JB)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Da se dakle savršenstvo postiglo po levitskom svećeništvu - jer na temelju njega narod je dobio Zakon - koja bi onda bila potreba da se po redu Melkisedekovu postavi drugi svećenik i da se ne imenuje po redu Aronovu?
(UKR)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Коли ж звершеннє було через Левійське сьвященствб (бо під ним люде озаконені стались), то яка ж іще потреба иншому встати сьвященикові по чину Мелхиседековому, а не по чину Аароновому звати ся?
(DK)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Ako je dakle savršenstvo postalo kroz Levitsko sveštenstvo (jer je narod pod njim zakon primio), kaka je još potreba bila govoriti da će drugi sveštenik postati po redu Melhisedekovu a ne po redu Aronovu?
(STRT)
Hebrews
7
:
11
ei men oun teleiōsis dia tēs leuitikēs ierōsunēs ēn o laos gar ep autē nenomothetēto tis eti chreia kata tēn taxin melchisedek eteron anistasthai ierea kai ou kata tēn taxin aarōn legesthai ei men oun teleiOsis dia tEs leuitikEs ierOsunEs En o laos gar ep autE nenomothetEto tis eti chreia kata tEn taxin melchisedek eteron anistasthai ierea kai ou kata tEn taxin aarOn legesthai
(TD)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Da se bijaše dospjelo jednom savršenom ispunjenju po levitskom *svećenstvu, - jer ono bijaše osnova zakonitosti dane narodu -, koja bi potreba još mogla podići jednog drugog *svećenika, u lozi Melhisedeka, umjesto da ga označi u lozi Aaronovoj?
(dkc)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Ако је дакле савршенство постало кроз Левитско свештенство (јер је народ под њим закон примио), кака је још потреба била говорити да ће други свештеник постати по реду Мелхиседекову а не по реду Аронову?
(AKJV)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
(ASV)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
(APB)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If perfection therefore is by Priesthood of Levi, ( for by it The Written Law was established to the people ), why was another Priest needed to arise in the image of Melchizedek? But does it say that he would be in the image of Aaron?
(DB)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with it, what need was there still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?
(DRB)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
(ERV)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
(ESV)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
(GWT)
Hebrews
7
:
11
The people established the Levitical priesthood based on instructions they received. If the work of the Levitical priests had been perfect, we wouldn't need to speak about another kind of priest. However, we speak about another kind of priest, a priest like Melchizedek, not a Levitical priest like Aaron.
(KJV)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
(NLT)
Hebrews
7
:
11
So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priesthood, with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron?
(WNT)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Now if the crowning blessing was attainable by means of the Levitical priesthood--for as resting on this foundation the people received the Law, to which they are still subject-- what further need was there for a Priest of a different kind to be raised up belonging to the order of Melchizedek instead of being said to belong to the order of Aaron?
(WEB)
Hebrews
7
:
11
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
(YLT)
Hebrews
7
:
11
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood -- for the people under it had received law -- what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?